CURING CONDITIONS IMPACT THE PROPERTIES OF A MODIFIED GEOPOLYMER MORTAR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.28.1.10

Keywords:

Geopolymer, Mortar, Compressive Strength, Silica Fume

Abstract

The present work provides an experimental study for preparing eco-friendly geopolymer mortar based on ground granulated blasted furnace slags with good mechanical properties and durability. This work studied the effect of silica fume reactive powder as a replacement material for slag weight with constant weight ratios of 20% on geopolymer mortar’s mechanical tests. The geopolymer mixtures were prepared with (15M) NaOH solution and a (2.5:1) ratio of (Na2SiO3/NaOH). The samples were cured at ambient conditions at different times of 7 and 28 days and a high temperature of 70°C in a furnace for three hours. It was found from the obtained results that silica fume played a vital role in improving all these properties by enhancing the degree of the silicate ion geopolymerization reaction in the alkaline solution. In addition, the curing process greatly impacted the geopolymers’ features. The properties improve significantly with increasing the curing time and temperature, especially when cured at high temperatures, compared to ambient curing.

References

Market Intelligence, World Cement Consumption. 2013. [cited 202; Fortune Business Insights, USA Available from: http://www.cement.org.

A. Mohammed, Z., A. Al-Jaberi, L., and N. Shubber, A., 2022. Effect of polypropylene fiber on properties of geopolymer concrete based metakaolin. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 58-67. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.25.2.7.

Davidovits, J., 1994. High-Alkali Cements for 21st Century Concretes. International Concrete Abstracts Portal - ACI Symposium Publication. Vol. 144383-398. https://doi.org/10.14359/4523.

Humphreys, K. and Mahasenan, M., 2002. Towards a sustainable cement industry. Substudy 8: climate change. Word Business Council for Sustainable Development.

Duxson, P., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., & Van Deventer, J. S., 2007. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 37, Issue 12, pp. 1590-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018.

Jabbar Alserai, S., Kadhim Alsaraj, W., and Abdulbari Aljaberi, L., 2022. Bearing load capacity of geopolymer concrete thin wall panels under eccentric compression. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. Vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 1-14.

Hamed, A. H. and Abass, W. Z., 2022. Effect of steel fiber proportion on silicon mechanical properties. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.26.1.6.

Gartner, E., 2004. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 34, Issue 9, pp. 1489-1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021.

Pilehvar, S., Cao, V. D., Szczotok, A. M., Valentini, L., Salvioni, D., Magistri, M., ... & Kjøniksen, A. L. 2017. Mechanical properties and microscale changes of geopolymer concrete and Portland cement concrete containing micro-encapsulated phase change materials. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 100341-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.07.012.

Thaarrini, J. and Dhivya, S., 2016. Comparative study on the production cost of geopolymer and conventional concretes. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research. Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 117-124.

Mohammed Fahad, B. and Mohammed Hamza, M., 2022. Improving some of the physical properties of cement mortar by the addition of glass fibers. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. Vol. 20, Issue 6, pp. 195-206.

Görhan, G. and Kürklü, G., 2014. The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures. Composites Part B: Engineering. Vol. 58371-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082.

Madheswaran, C., Gnanasundar, G., and Gopalakrishnan, N., 2013. Effect of molarity in geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Civil & Structural Engineering. Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 106-115. https://doi.org/10.6088/ijcser.20130402001.

Olivia, M. and Nikraz, H., 2012. Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Materials & Design (1980-2015). Vol. 36191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036.

Budh, C.D. and Warhade, N.R., 2014. Effect of molarity on compressive strength of geopolymer mortar. International journal of civil engineering research. Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 83-86.

Chien-Chung Chen, Ivan Diaz, Kathleen Menozzi, Luis Murillo, 2015. Experimental Study on Slag/Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete. International Journal of Mechanical And Production Engineering. Vol. 3, Issue 8, pp. 13-17.

Aliabdo, A.A., Abd Elmoaty, A.E.M., and Salem, H.A., 2016. Effect of cement addition, solution resting time and curing characteristics on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance. Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 123581-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.043.

Helmy, A.I.I., 2016. Intermittent curing of fly ash geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 11054-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.007.

Zhang, M., Zhao, M., Zhang, G., El-Korchi, T., & Tao, M., 2017. A multiscale investigation of reaction kinetics, phase formation, and mechanical properties of metakaolin geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites. Vol. 7821-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.010.

Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., Wang, K., & Zhang, J. 2018. A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B: Engineering. Vol. 15279-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.031.

Tippayasam, C., Sutikulsombat, S., Paramee, J., Leonelli, C., & Chaysuwan, D. 2018. Development of Geopolymer Mortar from Metakaolin Blended with Agricultural and Industrial Wastes. Key Engineering Materials. Vol. 766305-310. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.766.305.

No. 45. 1984. Aggregate from natural sources for concrete and construction. Specification, I., Iraq.

ASTM C494-99 1999. Standard Specification for Chemical Admixture for Concrete. Material, A.S.f.T.a., USA.

ASTM C109M-02. 2010. Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement mortars. Material, A.S.f.T.a., USA.

ASTM C293/C293M-16. 2016. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (using Simple Beam with Center-point Loading). Material, A.S.f.T.a., USA.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Submission Dates

Received 16/09/2022

Revised 01/11/2022

Accepted 24/02/2023

How to Cite

Jabbar, R., & Kamal, H. M. . (2024). CURING CONDITIONS IMPACT THE PROPERTIES OF A MODIFIED GEOPOLYMER MORTAR. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 28(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.28.1.10