Structural Efficiency and Embodied Carbon Assessment of Pre-Engineered Versus Conventional Steel Beams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.3791Keywords:
Conventional hot-rolled beam, Embodied carbon, Pre-engineered steel, Sustainability, Tapered built-up sectionAbstract
The increased focus on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the building and construction sector has heightened the demand for structural systems that reduce both material and embodied carbon. Pre-engineered building (PEB) systems using tapered built-up steel beams could potentially offer a viable alternative to traditional hot-rolled prismatic sections by better matching and aligning the sectional capacity and the bending demand. However, there are still a limited number of studies that perform comparative analyses integrating structural and environmental impact. This study assessed the structural efficiency and embodied carbon of pre-engineered and conventional steel beams over spans of 6 to 20 m for fixed-end and pinned-end boundary conditions. Structural design was performed in accordance with AISC 360-16, and embodied carbon was assessed for life cycle modules A1–A5 following BS EN 15978. The results indicate that tapered built-up beams achieve higher utilisation ratios and smaller effective section sizes, particularly for short and intermediate spans. Life-cycle assessment shows that pre-engineered beams reduce embodied carbon by approximately 10–25% compared with conventional beams, primarily owing to their lower steel mass. These findings demonstrate that tapered built-up beams offer both structural and environmental advantages in the investigated design context.
References
M. Shafique and X. Luo, “Environmental life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles from the current and future energy mix perspective,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 303, p. 114050, 2022.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114050
K. C. Onyelowe et al., “Global warming potential-based life cycle assessment and optimization of the compressive strength of fly ash–silica fume concrete: Environmental impact consideration,” Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 8, pp. 1–15, 2022.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.992552
A. Roy, B. Y. McCabe, S. Saxe, and I. D. Posen, “Review of factors affecting earthworks greenhouse gas emissions and fuel use,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 194, p. 114290, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114290
L. Shi et al., “Comparative study of greenhouse gas emission calculations and the environmental impact in the life cycle assessment of buildings in China, Finland, and the United States,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 70, p. 106396, 2023.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106396
A. Azam, M. Rafiq, M. Shafique, and J. Yuan, “Towards achieving environmental sustainability: The role of nuclear energy, renewable energy, and ICT in the top-five carbon emitting countries,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 9, pp. 1–11, 2022.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.804706
A. Azam, M. Rafiq, M. Shafique, H. Zhang, and J. Yuan, “Analyzing the effect of natural gas, nuclear energy, and renewable energy on GDP and carbon emissions: A multivariate panel data analysis,” Energy, vol. 219, p. 119592, 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119592
K. Kuusela, V. Uusitalo, J. Ahola, and J. Levänen, “The transformation of plastics production from net positive greenhouse gas emissions to net negative: An environmental sustainability assessment of CO₂-based polypropylene,” Journal of CO₂ Utilization, vol.52, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101672
J. Koo, S. Park, and Y. Lee, “National circumstances matter: How climate change vulnerability and political instability affect greenhouse gas coverage in nationally determined contributions,” Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 175, p. 104283, 2026.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104283
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2022. https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/2022-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction
H. L. Gauch, C. F. Dunant, W. Hawkins, and A. Cabrera Serrenho, “What really matters in multi-storey building design? A simultaneous sensitivity study of embodied carbon, construction cost, and operational energy,” Applied Energy, vol. 333, p. 120585, 2023.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120585
D. Gillespie and S. McIlwaine, “Reducing embodied carbon in the construction sector,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2021, pp. 744–753. https://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/b993b0702596b86a7056221aea3d0a64.pdf
M. P. Drewniok et al., “Mapping material use and embodied carbon in UK construction,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 197,p.107056,2023.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107056
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2021. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/2021-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction
K. E. Lai et al., “Quantification process of carbon emissions in the construction industry,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 289, p. 113025, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113025
L. Chen et al., “Green construction for low-carbon cities: A review,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 21, no. 3, 2023.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01544-4
J. García-López, M. Hernández-Valencia, J. Roa-Fernández, E. J. Mascort-Albea, and R. Herrera-Limones, “Balancing construction and operational carbon emissions: Evaluating neighbourhood renovation strategies,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 94, p. 109993, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109993
A. Bucur, G. Dobrotă, C. Oprean-Stan, and C. Tănăsescu, “Economic and Qualitative Determinants of the World Steel Production,” Metals, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 163, May 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/met7050163
British Constructional Steelwork Association (BCSA), UK Structural Steelwork: 2050 Decarbonisation Roadmap – Executive Summary. London, UK: BCSA, 2021
W. David and B. M. Ayyub, “Sustainability quantification and valuation. I: Definitions, metrics, and valuations for decision making,” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, p. E4016001, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000893
R. Hingorani and J. Köhler, “Towards optimised decisions for resource and carbon-efficient structural design,” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 40, no. 1–2, pp. 1–31, 2023.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2023.2198767
E. Ching and J. V. Carstensen, “Truss topology optimization of timber–steel structures for reduced embodied carbon design,” Engineering Structures, vol. 252, p. 113540, 2022.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113540
R. Suwondo and M. Keintjem, “Embodied carbon reduction strategies for steel structures: A parametric design approach,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, pp. 3215–3223, 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00973-y
R. Suwondo, Juliastuti, and M. Keintjem, “Integrated assessment of embodied carbon and financial costs in simply supported beams,” Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, vol. 9, p. 86, 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00439-x
A. Jayasinghe, J. Orr, T. Ibell, and W. P. Boshoff, “Minimising embodied carbon in reinforced concrete flat slabs through parametric design,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 50, p. 104136, 2022.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104136
]H.-Y. Chang, S.-N. Ma, Y.-C. Chiang, and C.-M. Lai, “The Effects of Structural Design Alternatives on the Embodied Carbon Emissions of Steel Buildings,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 99, p. 111603, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111603
Y. L. Li, M. Y. Han, S. Y. Liu, and G. Q. Chen, “Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by buildings: A multi-scale perspective,” Building and Environment, vol. 151, pp. 240–250, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.003
A. Kaveh, M. Z. Kabir, and M. Bohlool, “Optimal design of multi-span pitched roof frames with tapered members,” Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2019.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.13107
R. McKinstray, J. B. P. Lim, T. T. Tanyimboh, D. T. Phan, and W. Sha, “Optimal design of long-span steel portal frames using fabricated beams,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 104, pp 104–114,2015.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.010
A. Kaveh and M. H. Ghafari, “Geometry and sizing optimization of steel pitched roof frames with tapered members using nine metaheuristics,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0132-1
A. Kanyilmaz, P. R. N. Tichell, and D. Loiacono, “A genetic algorithm tool for conceptual structural design with cost and embodied carbon optimization,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol.112, p.104711, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104711
C. Couto, “Neural network models for the critical bending moment of uniform and tapered beams,” Structures, vol. 41, pp. 1746–1762, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.096
K. Shaik, R. R. B. S. S., and D. C. K. Jagarapu, “An analytical study on pre-engineered buildings using STAAD Pro,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, pp. 296–302, 2020.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.076
J. E. Woods and A. Wierzbowski, “Cyclic performance of pre-engineered beam-column connections for mass timber and hybrid mass timber-steel structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 347, p. 121683, 2026.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121683
L. Sharma, N. Taak, and P. Kumar Mishra, “A comparative study between the pre-engineered structures and conventional structures using STAAD Pro,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 3469–3475, 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.942
X. Huo and H. Xing, “New-type urbanization and corporate carbon performance: Evidence from a double machine learning model,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 11, p. 101674, 2026.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101674
S. Chan, S. Liu, and Y. Liu, “Second-order direct analysis of steel structures made of tapered members,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures (ASCCS 2018), 2018, pp. 75–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/asccs2018.2018.7221
É. Maia, C. Couto, P. Vila Real, and N. Lopes, “The general method for the fire design of I-section web-tapered beam–columns,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 174, p. 109108, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109108
E. J. Sippel, R. D. Ziemian, and H. B. Blum, “Analysis of non-symmetric cross-sections relative to the provisions of AISC 360-10,” in Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference, Structural Stability Research Council (SSRC 2020), 2020, pp. 1–28, [Online]. Available:https://files.ssrcweb.org/proceedings/2020/35SippeletalSSRC2020.pdf
Y. Guo and M. Alam, “Nonlinear bending and thermal postbuckling of magneto-electro-elastic nonlocal strain-gradient beam including surface effects,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 142, p. 115955, 2025.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2025.115955
M. Alam, Y. Guo, Y. Bai, and S. Luo, “Post-critical nonlinear vibration of nonlocal strain gradient beam involving surface energy effects,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 601, p. 118930, 2025.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2025.118930
T. Dokšanović, I. Radić, and B. Biserčić, “Buckling resistance of tapered steel columns,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11498, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011498
R. Bai, S.-W. Liu, and S.-L. Chan, “Modal and elastic time-history analysis of frames with tapered sections by non-prismatic elements,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 9, p. 1850106, 2018. doi:%20https:/doi.org/10.1142/S0219455418501067
L. Jia, P. Li, Y. Jia, and S. Cai, “Study on seismic performance of tapered castellated steel member portal frame,” Structures, vol. 58, p. 105540,2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105540
A. Salama, A. Atif, A. Eraky, and R. Samir, “Optimal design of steel gable frames with tapered members using enhanced crystal structure algorithm (ECryStAl),” Structures, vol. 50, pp. 1742–1751, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.019
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), ASCE/SEI 7-16: Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, Reston, VA, USA: ASCE, 2016.
Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI), SAP2000 v24: Structural Analysis and Design, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2022
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), ANSI/AISC 360-16: Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, Chicago, IL, USA: AISC, 2016.
British Standards Institution (BSI), BS EN 15978:2011: Sustainability of Construction Works – Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings – Calculation Method, London, UK: BSI, 2011.
O. P. Gibbon, J. J. Orr, C. Archer-Jones, and D. Green, How to Calculate Embodied Carbon, 2nd ed. London, UK: The Institution of Structural Engineers,2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.istructe.org/resources/guidance/how-to-calculate-embodied-carbon/
G. Hammond and C. Jones, “Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE) Database, Version 3.0,” 2011.
[Online]. Available: https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html
W. Choi, J. D. Morrow, F. E. Pfefferkorn, and M. R. Zinn, “Welding parameter maps to help select power and energy consumption of friction stir welding,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 33, pp. 35–42, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.04.017
International Energy Agency (IEA), Navigating Indonesia’s Power System Decarbonisation with the Indonesia Just Energy Transition Partnership, Paris, France: IEA, 2023.
Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Unit Cost Analysis for General Works,2024. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.pu.go.id/internal/assets/assets/produk/PermenPUPR/2023/08/2023pmpupr8.pdf
Downloads
Key Dates
Received
Revised
Accepted
Published Online First
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riza Suwondo, Made Suangga, Militia Keintjem, Traad Alzhrani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
