ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES ON THE KARKH SIDE OF BAGHDAD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.27.6.8Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Karkh side of Baghdad, transportation alternatives, multi-criteria decision-making, GISAbstract
The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a mathematical method which is considered This method is considered one of the most accurate methods in terms of making decisions by providing multiple options so that the decision-maker can calibrate and evaluate the alternatives. The city of Baghdad suffers from stifling traffic congestion due to the increase in population, which leads to a significant increase in the number of trips inside and outside the city, and with this, the number of vehicles is more than the capacity of the city’s road network; especially on the Karkh side. Three alternative roads were proposed in the network; namely: the first alternative is the fourth ring road that connects the Abu Ghraib highway and the roundabout bridge, the second road represents the link between the Washash roundabout and the Muthanna Airport intersection, the third alternative is constructing a tunnel from the Al-Paratha Mosque intersection in the direction of Haifa Street. The purpose of the study is to analyze and select the best alternative by using multi-criteria decision-making. Based on the results, it appears that the economic factor has the greatest effect on the selection of alternatives with its weight equal to 55%, followed by the accessibility factor with a weight of 29.8%. Although the second alternative was chosen as the best alternative in this manuscript, the first alternative is also important in terms of reducing traffic congestion and truck crossing within the city. To increase the efficiency of the network, it is proposed to implement the first and second proposals as well as widen the study region.
References
Munier N., and Hontoria H., (2021). Shortcomings of the AHP Method BT - Uses and Limitations of the AHP Method: A Non-Mathematical and Rational Analysis. 2021. Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-030-60392-2
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. Vol 13, Issue 1, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
Zahedi, F. (1987). A utility approach to the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling. Vol 9, Issue 3–5, pp. 387–395. DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90497-0
Al-Harbi K. M., (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 19, Issue. 1, pp. 19-27, 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
Mirzahossein H., Rassafi A. A, Jamali, Z., Guzik, R., Severino, A., and Arena, F. (2022). Active Transport Network Design Based on Transit-Oriented Development and Complete Street Approach: Finding the Potential in Qazvin. Infrastructures. Vol. 7, Issue. 2, DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures7020023.
Lai V. S., Wong B. K., and Cheung W. (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 137, Issue 1, pp. 134–144. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00084-4.
Tam M. C., and Tummala V. M. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega. Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 171–182. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6
Darko A., Chan A. P. C., Ameyaw E. E., Owusu E. K., Pärn E., and Edwards D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management. Vol. 19, Issue 5, pp. 436–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098
Sari F., Kandemir İ., Ceylan D. A., and Gül A. (2020). Using AHP and PROMETHEE multi-criteria decision-making methods to define suitable apiary locations. Journal of Apicultural Research. Vol. 59, Issue 4, pp. 546–557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1718341.
Stojčetović B., Nikolić D., Živković Ž., and Bogdanović D. (2019). Swot-AHP method application to determine current energy situation and define strategies for energy security improvement. Thermal Science. Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 861–872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI180319248S
Lyu H. M., Zhou W. H., Shen S. L., and Zhou A. N. (2020). Inundation risk assessment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen. Sustainable Cities and Society. Vol. 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102103
Baffoe G. (2019). Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries. Evaluation and Program Planning. VOL. 72, PP. 197–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.017
Otkovic I. I., Karleuša B., Deluka-Tibljaš A., Šurdonja S., and Marušić M. (2021). Combining traffic microsimulation modeling and multi-criteria analysis for sustainable spatial-traffic planning. Land. Vol. 10, Issue 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070666.
Al-Omari A., Shatnawi N., Khedaywi T., and Miqdady T. (2020). Prediction of traffic accidents hot spots using fuzzy logic and GIS. Applied Geomatics. Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 149–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00290-7
Farooq D., and Moslem S. (2022). Estimating Driver Behavior Measures Related to Traffic Safety by Investigating 2-Dimensional Uncertain Linguistic Data—A Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 14, Issue 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031881
Shaon, M. R. R., Li, X., Wu, Y. J., & Ramos, S. (2021). Quantitative evaluation of advanced traffic management systems using analytic hierarchy process. In Transportation Research Record. ISSN: 0361-1981.
Djouani I., Dehimi S., and Redjem A. Evaluation of the Efficiency and Quality of the Tram Route of Setif City, Algeria: Combining AHP and GIS Approaches. J. Geogr. Inst. Jovan Cvijic SASA, Vol. 72, Issue 1, pp. 85–102, 2022, DOI: 10.2298/IJGI2201085
Pogarčić I., Frančić M., and Davidović V. (2008). Application of AHP method in traffic planning. ISEP. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_Hierarch _Process.
Al-Jabbar A. S. A., Shubber A. A. M., and Aziz, H. Y. (2011). Reasons and possible remedies for Baghdad city traffic congestion. In ICTE 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Transportation Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41184(419)111.
Majda Muhsen Z. (2021). Projects: Iraq starts feasibility study for new Baghdad ring road project. February 11, 2022: [Available from https://www.zawya.com/en/projects/projects-iraq-starts-feasibility-study-for-new-baghdad-ring-road-project-bbendvpa
Marr, P. A., and Bahry. Louay (2022). Baghdad. Encyclopedia Britannica. [Available from https://www.britannica.com/place/Baghdad
Mongkut P., and Saengkhao N. (2003). Evaluation of Alternatives in Transportation Planning Using Multi-Stakeholders Multi-Objectives. Transportation. Vol. 4, Issue 1992, pp. 1613–1628.
Asmael, N. M., & Waheed, M. Q. (2023). Service evaluation of urban public transportation in Baghdad City. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 402, p. 09019). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340209019
Asmael, Noor M., and Mohanned Q. Waheed. (2022). Equity of transit need in Baghdad city. Transport Problems: an International Scientific Journal 17.1 (2022). DOI: 10.20858/tp.2022.17.1.03
Wazer, Z. B., and Moutaz, N. (2021, August). Location of freight warehouses facilities: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. In Journal of Physics Conference Series (Vol. 1973, No. 1, p. 012193). DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1973/1/012193
Downloads
Key Dates
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maryam M. Abdullah, Noor M. Asmael
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
