BIT ERROR PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT FOR UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC NOISE CHANNEL BY USING CHANNEL CODING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.27.5.8Keywords:
underwater acoustic channel, non-Gaussian distribution, polar code, channel coding, t-distributionAbstract
The harm that underwater noise pollution poses to aquatic ecosystems and the resources that support it are being acknowledged on a worldwide scale. Fisheries and ecotourism are only two of the important businesses that are impacted by noise pollution. Reducing underwater impact noise is a major challenge for underwater acoustic communication systems. However, the implementation of noise reduction measures (noise abatement) remains limited. Most communication systems assume that the noise is both additive and Gaussian. Underwater Acoustic Noise (UWAN) systems generally perform poorly because of the often large non-Gaussian components in intermittent noise in the ocean. This study presents an experimental model (Dolphin-EAR DE200 Series) sound channel noise underwater at Lake Diyala Hamrin, Iraq, using a hydrophone model. Low data volume, multipath propagation, low bandwidth, and higher bit error rate (BER) of received data are major issues for underwater communication systems. In this paper, the Underwater Acoustic Channel (UWAC) aspect is evaluated and an error performance term is determined from the noise in the Student's t-distribution. In addition, Signals using binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) and quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) are used to generate error power analysis.
References
A. Z. Sha’ameri, Y. Y. Al-Aboosi, and N. H. H. Khamis, 2019, “Underwater acoustic noise characteristics of shallow. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2014.34
Attenuation and Propagation Loss for Aqueous Solution of Sodium Chloride,” in 2019 International Conference on Recent Advances in Energy-efficient Computing and Communication (ICRAECC), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRAECC43874.2019.8995039
Y. Y. Al-Aboosi, A. Z. Bin Sha’ameri, and N. H. H. Khamis, 2016, “Comparison of methodologies for signal detection in underwater acoustic noise in shallow tropical waters,” ARPN J Eng Appl Sci, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3086–3094.
D. H. Cato, 2008, “Ocean ambient noise: its measurement and its significance to marine animals,” Proc. Inst. Acoust., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1–9.
F. Hanson and S. Radic, 2008, “High bandwidth underwater optical communication,” Appl. Opt., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 277– 283. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.000277
G. Burrowes and J. Y. Khan, 2011, “Short-range underwater acoustic communication networks,” Auton. Underw. Veh., pp. 173–198. https://doi.org/10.5772/24098
H. Kaushal and G. Kaddoum, 2016, “Underwater optical wireless communication,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 1518–1547. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2552538
J. G. Proakis and M. Salehi, 2008, Digital communications. McGraw-Hill.
J. Li, 2017, “Advanced OFDM Receivers for Underwater Acoustic Communications.” University of York.
J. R. Barry, E. A. Lee, and D. G. Messerschmitt, 2012, Digital communication. Springer Science & Business Media.
J. S. G. Panaro, F. R. B. Lopes, L. J. Matos, L. M. Barreira, and I. I. N. O. M. Odel, “Empirical Noise Model.
J. S. G. Panaro, F. R. B. Lopes, L. M. Barreira, and F. E. Souza, 2012, “Underwater acoustic noise model for shallow water communications. https://doi.org/10.14209/SBRT.2012.85
J. Zhang, L. Kou, Y. Yang, F. He, and Z. Duan, 2020, “Monte-Carlo-based optical wireless underwater channel modelling with oceanic turbulence,” Opt. Commun., vol. 475, p. 126214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.10.005
K. Chen, M. Ma, E. Cheng, F. Yuan, and W. Su, 2014, “A survey on MAC protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1433–1447. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.01.020
L. Lanbo, Z. Shengli, and C. Jun Hong, 2008, “Prospects and problems of wireless communication for underwater sensor networks,” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 977–994.
L. Liao, 2018, “Underwater Acoustic Localization with Applications to Multiuser Communications.” University of York.
Likelihood Metrics for Underwater Acoustic Communications,” 2012, Proc. IEEE Conf. Underw. Commun. Netw., no. 2, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1993.326226
M. Ahsanullah, B. M. G. Kibria, and M. Shakil, 2014, “Normal distribution,” in Normal and Student´ st Distributions and Their Applications, Springer, pp. 7–50. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-061-4
M. C. Domingo, “Magnetic induction for underwater wireless communication networks,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 6, no. 60, pp. 2929–2939, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2012.2194670
M. S. Ahmed et al., 2020, “Filter orthogonal frequency division multiplexing scheme based on polar code in underwater acoustic communication with non-gaussian distribution noise,” ETRI J. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2019-0564
M. S. Ahmed, N. S. M. Shah, F. Ghawbar, Y. A. Jawhar, and A. A. Almohammedi, 2020,“Filtered-OFDM with channel coding based on T-distribution noise for underwater acoustic communication,” J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01713-9
M. Stojanovic and J. Preisig, 2009, “Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.4752682
N.-S. N. Ismail, L. A. Hussein, and S. H. S. Ariffin, 2010, “Analyzing the performance of acoustic channel in underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN),” in 2010 Fourth Asia International Conference on Mathematical/Analytical Modelling and Computer Simulation, pp. 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1109/AMS.2010.111
R. Headrick and L. Freitag, 2009, “Growth of underwater communication technology in the US Navy,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.4752681
R. P. Hodges.Underwater acoustics: 2011, Analysis, design and performance of sonar: John Wiley & Sons.
S. Al-Dharrab, M. Uysal, and T. M. Duman, 2013, “Cooperative underwater acoustic communications [accepted from open call],” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 146–153. 1 https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6553691
S. Banerjee and M. Agrawal, 2014, “On the performance of underwater communication system in noise with Gaussian mixture statistics,” in 2014 Twentieth National Conference on Communications (NCC), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/NCC.2014.6811369
Z. Zeng, S. Fu, H. Zhang, Y. Dong, and J. Cheng, 2016: “A survey of underwater optical wireless communications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 204–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2618841
S. Jiang, 2019, Wireless networking principles: from terrestrial to underwater acoustic. Springer,
T. Melodia et al., 2013, “Advances in Underwater Acoustic Networking.” Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118511305.ch23
W. Sun, 2014 “Online Learning of the Spatial-Temporal Channel Variation in Underwater Acoustic Communication Networks.” Michigan Technological University. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/934
Tahir, B., Schwarz, S., & Rupp, M. (2017). BER comparison between Convolutional, Turbo, LDPC, and Polar codes. 2017 24th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT.2017.7998249
Bernard S (2001).” Digital communications fundamentals and applications”. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
E. Arikan, Channel polarization: A method for constructing capacity-achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memoryless channels, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55 (2009), 3051–3073.
Downloads
Key Dates
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Thamer Essa Murad , Yasin Yousif Al-Aboosi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
