Strength Design Requirements of ACI-318M-02 Code, BS8110, and EuroCode2 for Structural Concrete: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Ali AbdulHussein Jawad Al-Ghalib Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7625-7871

Keywords:

Strength Design Requirements, Design codes, ACI-318, BS 8110, EuroCode 2

Abstract

This paper is intended to compare the design requirements of the structural building codes from safety and economical point of view. Three different famous structural building codes have been adopted. These are the ACI 318M-02, BS8110:1985, and Euro Code2:1992. These codes have been compared to the strength design requirements of structural elements. The comparison includes safety provisions, flexural design, shear design, and column design. Throughout this study elaborated design models and criteria of the considered codes have been exhibited. Although the principles contained in these codes are basically the same, they differ in detail. The comparison between results has shown that EC2 is more liberal in partial safety factors and strength design than ACI Code. After following this study, design engineers will discover easily that the transition among codes is not a difficult process.

Downloads

Key Dates

Published

2006-03-01

How to Cite

Strength Design Requirements of ACI-318M-02 Code, BS8110, and EuroCode2 for Structural Concrete: A Comparative Study. (2006). Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 136-150. https://jeasd.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/jeasd/article/view/1766

Similar Articles

1-10 of 764

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.