Mechanical Properties and Numerical Modelling for Prosthetic Foot

Authors

  • Saif M. Abbas Prosthetic and Orthotic Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-0602
  • Jumaa S. Chiad Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5181-3525
  • Ayad M. Takhakh Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-0405

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.2112

Keywords:

Biomechanics, Fatigue, Gait cycle, Material characterization, Prosthetic limb, Simulation analysis

Abstract

This study uses laminated composite materials made of hybrid glass and carbon fibers to determine the mechanical characteristics of the foot. Tensile, bending, and fatigue of composite material were evaluated and applied to the ANSYS model. The volume fraction for carbon and glass fibers was 22.5% and 10.04%, respectively. The mechanical property results: σy = 40 MPa, σult = 150 MPa, and E = 1.2 GPa. The patient is a 30-year-old male with a left amputation side, 1.60 meters tall, and weighs 74 kg. The analysis was carried out for the two scenarios (toe-off and heel contact) as boundary conditions. The overall deformation, equivalent stresses, and foot safety factor have been calculated using ANSYS17.2 software. In the end, it appears that the foot is secure based on equivalent stress calculations and the Von-Mises hypothesis. The computed safety factor for the foot is constructed of a chosen composite material with the subsequent layers. When the heel (stance phase) is fixed at 1.3449, and the metatarsal (toe off) is fixed at 1.259, the safety factor for a force of 860 N is reached. The foot is secure, according to the Von-Mises hypothesis. 

References

M. Windrich, M. Grimmer, O. Christ, S. Rinderknecht, and P. Beckerle, “Active Lower Limb prosthetics: a Systematic Review of Design Issues and Solutions,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, vol. 15, no. S3, Dec. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0284-9.

M. I. Awad et al., “Towards a Smart Semi-Active Prosthetic Leg: Preliminary Assessment and Testing,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 21, pp. 170–176, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.539.

A. F. Azocar, L. M. Mooney, J.-F. Duval, A. M. Simon, L. J. Hargrove, and E. J. Rouse, “Design and Clinical Implementation of an open-source Bionic Leg,” Nature Biomedical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 941–953, Oct. 2020, doi https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00619-3.

Gh. Pirouzi, N. A. Abu Osman, A. Eshraghi, S. Ali, H. Gholizadeh, and W. A. B. Wan Abas, “Review of the Socket Design and Interface Pressure Measurement for Transtibial Prosthesis,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, pp. 1–9, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/849073.

S. M. Abbas, Ghanim Sh. Sadiq, and Muhammed Abdul Sattar, “Improving the Composite Materials for Bi Lateral Prosthesis with below Knee Amputation,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 1002, pp. 379–388, Jul. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1002.379.

S. M. Abbas, "Fatigue Characteristics and Numerical Modeling Socket for Patient with Above Knee Prosthesis," Defect and Diffusion Forum, vol. 398, pp. 76–82, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.398.76.

S. H. Rapp, N. Pathak, A. Yellapragada, S. Gayakwad, M. Gupta, and K. Musunuru, “Current Trends & Challenges in Prosthetic Product Development: Literature Review,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1554–1563, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.21275/art20198727.

S. M. Abbas and A. I. Kubba, “Fatigue Characteristics and Numerical Modelling Prosthetic for Chopart Amputation,” Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, vol. 2020, p. e4752479, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4752479.

J. Pearlman et al., “Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries [An Overview],” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 12–22, Mar. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/emb.2007.907372.

T. Ugorji, J. Ekezie, C. KAnyam, W. Osuchukwu, and J. Nwakanma, “Inclusion of Ankle Joint in the Design and Fabrication of Below-Knee Prosthesis.,” International Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (IJHRS), vol. 7, no. 1, p. 131, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijhrs.0000000155.

S. Abbas, K. Resan, A. Muhammad, and M. Al-Waily, “Mechanical And Fatigue Behaviors Of Prosthetic For Partial Foot Amputation With Various Composite Materials Types Effe Ct,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET, vol. 9, no. 9, 2018, Available: https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJMET/VOLUME_9_ISSUE_9/IJMET_09_09_042.pdf

J. Zagoya-López, L. A. Zúñiga-Avilés, A. H. Vilchis-González, and J. C. Ávila-Vilchis, “Foot/Ankle Prostheses Design Approach Based on Scientometric and Patentometric Analyses,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 5591, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125591.

Z. H. Zaier and K. K. Resan, “EFFECT OF THE GAIT SPEED ON a NEW PROSTHETIC SHANK BELOW KNEE,” Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 63–69, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.26.4.7.

K. Kamil, Y. K. Ibrahim, and S. H. Challoob, “Stress Relaxation On Prosthetic Laminated Socket Materials,” Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, vol. 20, no. 3, May 2015.

J. Sánchez Otero, R. J. Hernández, and J. E. Torres S., “The Mechanical Design of a Transfemoral Prosthesis Using Computational Tools and Design Methodology,” Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 14–18, Sep. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v32n3.35934.

S. K. Au, J. Weber, and H. Herr, “Powered Ankle--Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–66, Feb. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2008.2008747.

M. Ashmi, S. Jayaraj, and K. S. Sivanandan, “Development of a Robust Microcontroller Based Output Feedback Control for Assistive Limb,” IEEE Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), vol. 306, pp. 193–197, Dec. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/iecbes.2014.7047484.

V. Dhokia, J. Bilzon, E. Seminati, D. C. Talamas, M. Young, and W. Mitchell, “The Design and Manufacture of a Prototype Personalized Liner for Lower Limb Amputees,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 60, pp. 476–481, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.049.

A. E. Yousif, "The Design, Development, and Construction of an Adjustable Lower Extremity," IOSR Journal of Engineering, vol. 02, no. 10, pp. 30–42, Oct. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/3021-021033042.

H. Xie, Z. Li, and F. Li, “Bionics Design of Artificial Leg and Experimental Modeling Research of Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” Journal of Robotics, vol. 2020, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3481056.

W. C. da Silva Júnior, M. A. V. de Oliveira, J.-J. Bonvent, W. C. da Silva Júnior, M. A. V. de Oliveira, and J.-J. Bonvent, “Conception, Design and Development of a low-cost Intelligent Prosthesis for one-sided Transfemoral Amputees,” Research on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 62–69, Mar. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.0647.

Downloads

Key Dates

Received

2023-08-01

Revised

2024-11-29

Accepted

2024-11-30

Published Online First

2025-01-01

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Abbas, S. M., Chiad, J. S. . . . . . . . . ., & Takhakh, A. M. . (2025). Mechanical Properties and Numerical Modelling for Prosthetic Foot. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 29(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.2112

Similar Articles

1-10 of 680

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.